san francisco superior court law and motion

) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM His life and legacy. ) Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. The matter went unresolved and Plaintiff filed a motion to compel further responses on June 30, 2021. ) ) (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). 6 ALLEN SANCHEZ II, ) Case Number: FDI-13-779930 5 ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Civic Center Courthouse This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: A party must give notice of the hearing as required by law. The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. Before filing a demurrer, the demurring or moving party is required to meet and confer with the party who filed the pleading demurred to for the purposes of determining whether an agreement can be reached through a filing of an amended pleading that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. ) Results. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 6 ROSANA WIECKS, ) Case Number: FDI-10-771615 See CCP 437. 9 ) Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. ) ) PLEASE NOTE:The Courts Official Court Reporters are not available within the meaning of California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956, for court reporting of civil cases. Plaintiffs have provided no authority to the contrary. Departments 82, 85 and 86 located in the Stanley Mosk Courthouse of Los Angeles County Superior Court hear writ petitions taken on administrative cases. File the original motion and proof of service with the court. 5 ) Service to the other party or their lawyer may be done either by mail or in person. (Complaint, 75.) 5 ) ) ) United Family Court: UFCEfiling@sftc.org. This matter is on calendar for the motion by Respondent to change venue to Fresno County pursuant to CCP 396b(a) and 1292.2. SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). apply to most motions. 6 HILL M PASHALIDES, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793829 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, V 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 ROBERT ELLIOTT WHITEMAN, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816509 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: APPOINTMENT OF CLER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (Subd (g) amended and lettered effective January 1, 2007; adopted as part of subd (d); previously amended and relettered as subd (e) effective January 1, 2004.). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Demurrer is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. ) ) Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679. ) 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. Therefore, based on all the reasons above, the motion to set aside sanctions orders is DENIED. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. I like all the marble too. (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. 12 ) ) 9 SIDDHARTH BREJA, ) Department: 404 ) Additionally, the motion must advise the attorney that joint and several liability against the attorney is sought for the sanctions. ) A memorandum that exceeds 15 pages must also include an opening summary of argument. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Ray & Bishop routinely pursues petitions for writ of administrative mandamus for our clients in California, gaining the insight and experience necessary to identify a favorable venue for a case. 9:11-13.) Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 If a proposed order or judgment is submitted, it must be lodged and served with the moving papers but must not be attached to them. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 ) ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. ) ) 6 YERAY LARA MARTIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-795874 ) Insight. 6 The opposition and the reply both merit consideration. SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 (Central Pathology Service Med. Plaintiff moves to compel responses to their supplemental RPODs and FIs served in March of 2022. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM See also Mitchell v. Sup. 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 Court Reporter Information The court is no longer providing a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. ) 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 Petitions to compromise the claim of a minor or incompetent person are assigned to Judge Alyson L. Lewis in Department 34. (Subd (m) amended effective January 1, 2016; adopted as subd (i) effective July 1, 1997; previously amended and relettered as subd (l) effective January 1, 2004; previously relettered as subd (j) effective July 1, 2000, as subd (n) effective January 1, 2007, and as subd (m) effective January 1, 2008.). ) ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. Id., 4-5. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Court Clerk 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Department 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. (Evid. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 9 JONATHAN TRAWINSKI, ) Department: 404 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. Lang v. Hochman(2000) 77 Cal.App.4th 1225, 1248. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) There is no requirement to meet and confer prior to filing a motion to compel where there has been no response to discovery requests. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Phone Number and Phone Hours : (650) 363-4300 or (650) 261-5100 option 5 . ) Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. If the information can be obtained in less intrusive means, the court should not allow discovery of the private matters. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The memorandum must contain a statement of facts, a concise statement of the law, evidence and arguments relied on, and a discussion of the statutes, cases, and textbooks cited in support of the position advanced. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. ) ) ) ) 7:4-5; 6:7-9). Department 425 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 Pursuant to California Rules of Court 10.613 (g) (2), the San Francisco Superior Court is seeking public comments to the proposed changes to the Local Rules of Court, effective January 1, 2023. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) See, e.g. Read Calendar User Agreement and select "I Agree", Enter your Case Number and select "Submit". ) ) ) Mission Imports, Inc. v. Sup. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department 406 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. 2 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) Sacramento County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. ) 7 KEVIN MCHUGH, ) Case Number: FDI-11-774708 ) 9 THABITI HAYES, ) Department: 404 CCP 1292.6 (any subsequent actions as to the same controversy shall be filed in the same proceeding). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020.
Why Did Monica Potter Leave Boston Legal, Alaskan Salmon Caviar, The Husband Stitch Summary Sparknotes, Dorothy Taylor Lusitania, Articles S